Thursday, September 26, 2013

30 Days of Night – Steve Niles, Ben Templesmith

           30 Days of Night introduces a vampire tale in a graphic medium. The plot is simple. The small Alaskan town of Barrow experiences a polar winter every year lasting thirty days, and a vampire baddy named Marlow decides to cash in on the opportunity and orchestrates a month long feeding frenzy for twenty of his kind. A few individuals survive the initial frenzy and hide, but soon their food stores run low and it is apparent they won’t survive to see the sun at the rate things are going. The town sheriff, Eben sacrifices himself, and injects blood from an infected citizen to turn himself into a vampire and uses his new strength to destroy the vampires. And then he decides to watch the sunrise with his wife and end his existence before he entirely loses his humanity.
            The graphic novel is under a hundred pages long. Even with an incredibly simple plot, I think the story suffers for its brevity. The title of the work is 30 Days of Night. Thirty days of the vampire apocalypse in total darkness, cut off from the outside world, starving and freezing, might as well be an eternity. The narrative doesn’t do justice to the situation. The entire month is glossed through with a vampire killing montage. The entire day to day struggle of the survivors is lost, with all of their fear, despair, and grief. The novel spends more time on the set up than it does on the event, and even the resolution. I felt an emotional disconnect from the story and characters. The only panel that got to me was the last one, when Eben and his wife watch their last sunrise.
            That said, the vampires in 30 Days of Night have a unique feel to them, partially contributed through their characteristics, and partially due to the art style. These vampires are intelligent, but have clearly lost their humanity. They lack the seductive grace and refinement of the modern vampire and instead exhibit bestial savagery, and overwhelming hunger. The muted colors and sketchy style of the art, though confusing at times, gives a gritty, hardboiled feel to the beasts. They are primitive, not in intelligence, they clearly have higher reasoning powers, but in their mentality. Most of the vampires are completely driven by their most base desire to feed above all else. The artistic focus on teeth and wide, gaping mouths drives the endless hunger of the monsters home, and their glossy black eyes robs them of humanity. These vampires are not tormented by their fallen state, or haunted by memories of the past. They are clearly new beings, completely disjoined with whoever they were in life.
            In some ways, the 30 Days of Night vampires reminded me more of the Wendigo from Algonquian myth; a terrible spirit of hunger and cannibalism, that feeds and feeds but is never satiated. I enjoyed these vampires because the theme of insatiable hunger is one I enjoy in horror. It drives the monsters with limitless motivation, robs the prey of any hope of respite, and dehumanizes the survivors at the same time, degenerating them into so much meat, blood and bone. That level of dehumanization is frightening in many ways, because it forces people to look at the reality of their mortality. We are meat. All of the intelligence, emotion, dreams, and soul of our existence is no assurance that we will ever be more than meat when we die.

            Ironic that the immortal vampires of 30 Days of Night can embody the fear of ultimate human mortality. 

7 comments:

  1. Oo, nice comparison with Wendigo!

    I agree that the month is glossed over. A montage does not really convey the gravitas of dread that the survivors must have been feeling, although at the same time shouldn't they start to feel more hopeful as the dawn approaches? Instead it's still just more death. I also have to wonder how much the vampires thought through the eventual 30 Days of Day on the other side of the calendar when picking their buffet spot.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think one of the reasons the month seems rushed is that this didn't start out as a graphic novel. What we just read as a single volume is a collection of three separate issues of limited series comic. The limited series turned into a franchise, but the story in this book was the first three separate comics.

    I really liked, "They lack the seductive grace and refinement of the modern vampire and instead exhibit bestial savagery, and overwhelming hunger." I think that's what makes them true monsters. Charming vampires tend become Ted Bundy with different appetites; they end up resembling monstrous humans rather than being monsters in their own right.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with you, Patricia. These vampires were scary because there was little to no human qualities left. For all intents and purpose they were carnivores that could talk. It worked well for me and made them quite monstrous

    ReplyDelete
  4. I completely agree that the vampires lost their mentality. While they are highly intelligent, they are driven by their base need to survive and it overrides any lingering humanity they may have had. This is what makes them so terrifying.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think I have to disagree about the month montage. I didn't mind it because ultimately the story wasn't about how the humans survived, but how it ended, and how the vampires' existence became known to more of humanity. Also to echo Patricia this story wasn't meant to be a stand-alone. If it was, then I'd probably want to see more of what the survivors went through during those days. But as the beginning of something bigger, the briefness of the initial incident didn't bother me.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You make an interesting point about the vampire's hunger dehumanizing the survivors - I'd never have thought about it that way, but that's certainly the way the vampires think about them. I also agree about the emotional disconnect you mentioned, it was difficult to empathize with the victims when things were happening so fast. But I guess that is one of the limits of a shorter piece.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree that the comic could have been a bit longer. It would have been nice to develop more of a bond with the characters, but Stella plays a larger role in the series if you want to continue reading the graphic novels that followed 30 Days. I almost think that if we had more time, we should have read the first three graphic novels (all about the same length) and talk about them all at once to really get a look at the story line, characters, and over-arching themes. Oh, well...

    ReplyDelete