Wednesday, August 28, 2013

I Am Legend - Richard Matheson


            
            My honest opinion was asked for, and it shall be given. I Am Legend was lukewarm for me. I didn’t find it particularly scary, or cerebral. It was an easy read, and not like pulling teeth, but it still left something to be desired. After some long contemplation, I’ve finally figured out why I Am Legend didn’t do it for me.
            
            It lacked character interaction.
          
            Going into this book, I knew the vast majority was going to be about a solitary character, pitted against forces beyond his control, and struggling for survival. This actually excited me, because some of my favorite childhood novels included Island of the Blue Dolphins, Julie of the Wolves, and just about everything Gary Paulsen touched. Solitary survival stories were my jam for a long time. So why was I Am Legend different? Why did the lack of other characters leave me so cold?
           
            Robert Neville.
          
            I will be the first one to jump on a survival story with a solitary protagonist, providing I like that protagonist, or at least find him compelling. I did not like Robert Neville, nor did I find him compelling. For me, Robert was scene after scene of excessive drinking and foolish mistakes. I like my characters flawed, I do, but I also like them inventive, and resourceful, especially in a solitary survival situation. In Island of the Blue Dolphins Karana made a fence out of whale ribs and a lamp out of tiny fish. I was totally underwhelmed by Robert Neville’s ability to plaster paper mosaics on the wall, and then get drunk and destroy them.

The one thing Robert did that did impress me, was teach himself relatively complex skills from reference books. It was so impressive, that when we got to the part where he was using the microscope to identify the bacteria that created vampires, I called bull. Bull. Every surface of the world is covered in so many different microorganisms, their numbers are uncountable. So when Robert Neville found the ONE bacteria responsible for the vampire outbreak, I couldn’t believe it. It disillusioned the fantasy. Why would he be so sure it was that ONE bacteria instead of the hundreds of others he must have found crawling around on the slide or sample? Are vampires entirely sterile microcosms? With their faulty lymph system and poor waste processing abilities, I don’t think so.

Moving on. There was another problem I had with Robert. I found him to be… incredibly Rape-y. There is no better word to describe this. He was Rape-y, and the explanation I was given for these very uncomfortable mental tangents, was basically, everyone was dead so he wasn’t getting any nookie. I'm not a guy, so maybe I'm wrong, but I find it a little hard to believe that when somewhat normal men go on a dry spell, they become internally rape-y. This started off uncomfortable and remained uncomfortable. There were several instances throughout the book, where I looked away, said, “Oh my God, please don’t go there,” and then returned to reading. It made me question Robert’s character, and it made me feel like I was trapped alone in a dark room with a psycho. In horror, you’d think this would be a good thing, but for me it wasn’t. He was not one of those compelling psychos you love to hate. He was creepy, and sad.


However, so not to leave the impression that the book was a total bust, the scene with the dog punched like a twelve gauge, right in the chest. I was very impressed. It is rare that the best scene in the film adaptation of a novel is the best scene in the novel too. And they were so different, but both were outstanding.